Presto vs BigQuery

Presto vs BigQuery? Which is better for you?

In today’s data-driven world, fast and scalable SQL engines are essential to power real-time insights, business dashboards, and machine learning workflows.

As data volumes grow and architectures evolve toward hybrid and cloud-native environments, choosing the right engine becomes increasingly complex.

Two technologies often compared in this space are Presto and BigQuery.

Both are designed for large-scale, distributed SQL querying, but they serve very different roles.

Presto is an open-source federated SQL engine built to run queries across heterogeneous data sources.

Meanwhile, BigQuery is Google Cloud’s serverless, fully managed data warehouse, optimized for high-speed analytics on structured and semi-structured data.

This article offers a practical, side-by-side comparison of Presto and BigQuery, focusing on performance, architecture, cost, integrations, and ideal use cases.

Whether you’re building a modern data lakehouse, running multi-source analytics, or architecting a centralized warehouse strategy, this guide will help your data engineering and analytics teams choose the tool that best fits your needs.

Helpful Resources

What is Presto?

Presto is an open-source, distributed SQL query engine designed for interactive analytics at scale.

Originally developed at Facebook (now Meta) to enable fast, ad-hoc querying across massive data volumes, Presto has since evolved into a community-driven project under the Presto Foundation, part of the Linux Foundation.

Unlike traditional data warehouses, Presto doesn’t store data.

Instead, it operates as a read-only engine, querying data in-place across diverse sources such as:

Hadoop/Hive
Relational databases like MySQL and PostgreSQL
Object stores like Amazon S3
Streaming platforms like Apache Kafka

This makes it an ideal choice for organizations embracing data lakehouse architectures or running federated queries across mixed systems.

Presto’s key advantages include:

ANSI SQL compliance: Enables familiar querying for analysts and engineers
Highly parallelized MPP architecture: Supports fast performance on large datasets
Plugin-based connectors: Extend Presto’s reach to virtually any data source

Two major variants now exist:

PrestoDB, maintained by Meta and the Presto Foundation
Trino (formerly PrestoSQL), a fork maintained by the original Presto creators

Related: Presto vs Trino – Which one should you choose?

What is BigQuery?

BigQuery is Google Cloud’s fully managed, serverless data warehouse built to handle large-scale, SQL-based analytics.

It’s designed for organizations that need to analyze petabyte-scale datasets with minimal infrastructure overhead.

At its core, BigQuery provides:

A highly scalable MPP (Massively Parallel Processing) engine
Automatic infrastructure management, including scaling, replication, and optimization
Native support for ANSI SQL, including advanced analytics functions

Key features of BigQuery include:

Serverless architecture: No provisioning or resource scaling needed
Columnar storage and built-in caching: Optimized for high-speed performance
Seamless integration with GCP tools such as Google Sheets, Dataflow, and Vertex AI
Built-in machine learning capabilities (BigQuery ML)

BigQuery uses a pay-as-you-go pricing model, charging based on the volume of data processed per query or through flat-rate pricing for committed use.

For teams already invested in the Google Cloud ecosystem or looking for fully managed analytics infrastructure, BigQuery offers a powerful, enterprise-ready solution.

Presto vs BigQuery: Architecture Comparison

At a high level, Presto and BigQuery take fundamentally different architectural approaches to solving the problem of large-scale SQL analytics.

Presto is a distributed SQL query engine that sits on top of various data sources. It doesn’t store data itself—instead, it queries external systems like Hive, S3, MySQL, or Kafka in place.

This makes it highly flexible and ideal for federated queries across heterogeneous data sources.

BigQuery, on the other hand, is a serverless, managed data warehouse.

It stores data internally (in columnar format) and handles all infrastructure behind the scenes.

It’s optimized for high-performance analytics on structured and semi-structured data within Google Cloud.

Here’s a side-by-side comparison of their architectures:

Feature	Presto	BigQuery
Data Storage	No storage; queries external sources	Managed columnar storage within BigQuery
Compute Model	Distributed (clustered) MPP engine	Serverless MPP engine
Query Execution	Pulls data from sources in real time	Executes on internal columnar format (slots)
Scalability	Horizontal; depends on deployed infrastructure	Auto-scaled; managed by Google
Management Overhead	Requires setup, tuning, and monitoring	Fully managed; minimal operational overhead
Integration	External connectors (Hive, Kafka, S3, etc.)	Deep GCP integration (BigLake, Vertex AI, Dataflow)

Presto offers the advantage of data federation and source flexibility, while BigQuery excels in performance, ease of use, and deep integration within Google Cloud.

Presto vs BigQuery: Performance

When evaluating query engines for analytics, performance is a top priority—especially when working with large datasets, multiple data sources, or frequent dashboard refreshes.

BigQuery and Presto take different approaches to achieving fast, scalable query execution.

Presto Performance

Presto is designed for interactive, low-latency SQL analytics over distributed datasets.

It uses a Massively Parallel Processing (MPP) architecture, where queries are broken into stages and executed across multiple worker nodes.

Performance is often excellent—particularly when:

The cluster is well-tuned and adequately resourced.
Queries involve partitioned and columnar formats (like Parquet or ORC).
The data is local (e.g., co-located in the same cloud region).

However, Presto’s performance is highly dependent on infrastructure.

Since it doesn’t manage its own storage, I/O bottlenecks and network latency between data sources can affect query times.

Organizations using Presto must invest in cluster sizing, resource tuning, and query profiling to maintain optimal performance.

For enhanced performance, some Presto derivatives—like Starburst or Trino—offer features like query caching, cost-based optimization, and smart joins.

BigQuery Performance

BigQuery is engineered for speed and scale, particularly for analytical workloads that span billions of rows or petabytes of data.

It uses a fully serverless MPP architecture where:

Queries are automatically parallelized and distributed.
The execution engine takes advantage of Colossus, Google’s high-throughput storage system.
Dremel-based technology enables fast aggregation with minimal I/O.

BigQuery also includes built-in performance accelerators, such as:

Automatic query optimization based on historical patterns.
Materialized views for repeated aggregations.
Result caching, which can make repeated queries near-instantaneous.
Partitioned and clustered tables, which reduce scan costs and speed up performance.

Because it’s fully managed, BigQuery handles most of the optimization and scaling transparently, which is a major benefit for teams that don’t want to manage infrastructure.

Summary

Aspect	Presto	BigQuery
Execution Model	MPP engine across managed or self-hosted nodes	Serverless MPP engine with auto-scaling
Speed	Fast for federated queries with tuned setup	Very fast; optimized for massive datasets
Tuning Required	Yes – manual tuning of cluster and queries	Minimal – Google handles query optimization
Performance Bottlenecks	Network latency, source I/O, underpowered cluster	None significant (Google infra abstracts them)
Caching	Not native (extensions like Starburst help)	Native result and materialized view caching

Presto vs BigQuery: Scalability

Scalability is a critical factor when evaluating SQL engines for growing data volumes, concurrent users, and dynamic workloads.

Both Presto and BigQuery offer impressive scalability—but with fundamentally different approaches.

Presto Scalability

Presto scales horizontally by adding more worker nodes to its cluster.

It follows a shared-nothing architecture, where compute resources operate independently, making it well-suited for:

Distributed querying across large, diverse datasets
On-prem or cloud deployments where you control infrastructure
Use cases that require custom tuning and flexibility

However, this also means that scaling requires hands-on management. You’ll need to:

Monitor and allocate resources manually
Manage failure recovery and node balancing
Optimize based on workload characteristics

For many teams, the effort to scale Presto is simplified by using commercial distributions such as Starburst or Ahana, which offer auto-scaling, resource isolation, and multi-cluster management features out of the box.

BigQuery Scalability

BigQuery’s scalability is automatic and serverless.

As a fully managed Google Cloud service, it abstracts all infrastructure concerns.

You don’t need to provision nodes, manage clusters, or worry about concurrency limits.

Key benefits include:

Elastic compute power that adjusts to your query needs
Seamless support for concurrent queries from multiple users
No infrastructure bottlenecks, even at petabyte scale

BigQuery’s architecture is ideal for organizations looking to run high-scale analytics workloads with minimal DevOps involvement.

Whether you’re ingesting terabytes per day or running thousands of BI queries per hour, BigQuery scales on demand.

Summary

Aspect	Presto	BigQuery
Scaling Method	Horizontal (add worker nodes)	Serverless and automatic
Management Overhead	High – requires tuning and infrastructure setup	Very low – managed entirely by Google
Elasticity	Depends on setup or third-party tools	Native elastic scaling
Ideal For	Custom deployments with full control	Massive-scale analytics with minimal effort

Presto vs BigQuery: Data Source Flexibility

In today’s distributed data landscape, the ability to query across various systems without unnecessary data movement is often a core requirement.

Both Presto and BigQuery offer some level of flexibility here—but with different strengths and limitations.

Presto: Built for Federated Querying

Presto was designed from the ground up for federated querying, which means it can access and analyze data across multiple sources without moving it.

Also, Presto supports an extensive list of connectors, including:

Data lakes (Hive, HDFS, S3)
Relational databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQL Server, Oracle)
NoSQL systems (Cassandra, MongoDB)
Streaming platforms (Kafka, Pulsar)

This makes Presto ideal for organizations with hybrid or multi-source data architectures.

You can run a single SQL query that joins tables from S3, MySQL, and Kafka, all in real time—without ETL.

Key Benefits:

Avoid data duplication and movement
Supports ad hoc analytics over raw or live data
Easily extendable via custom connectors

BigQuery: Optimized for Native Storage

While BigQuery is powerful, its performance and simplicity are optimized when querying native BigQuery tables—i.e., data stored in Google’s columnar storage.

You can also query external sources via:

BigLake and external tables (e.g., on GCS)
Federated queries to Google Sheets, Cloud SQL, and other GCP sources
Data connectors to systems like Salesforce, AWS S3 (via transfer services)

However, these external connections come with performance and functionality trade-offs, such as:

Increased latency
Limited support for advanced query features
Potential cost implications for cross-platform access

BigQuery works best when data is loaded into its native format—via ETL or ELT pipelines—especially for production analytics.

Summary

Feature	Presto	BigQuery
Federation Capabilities	Excellent – built-in connectors to many systems	Limited – best with native BigQuery tables
Data Movement Required	No	Often yes (for optimal performance)
External Data Query Support	Broad and extensible	Available, but limited performance
Ideal For	Hybrid/multi-cloud analytics	Centralized data in Google Cloud

Presto vs BigQuery: Cost Model

Understanding the pricing and total cost of ownership is crucial when selecting a query engine, especially at scale. ‘

BigQuery and Presto offer very different cost models—one being open-source and infrastructure-dependent, and the other being fully managed with usage-based pricing.

Presto: Open-Source with Infrastructure Overhead

Firstly, Presto itself is free and open-source, which means there’s no software licensing fee.

However, the actual cost comes from how you choose to run and manage it:

Self-hosted deployments (e.g., on EC2, Kubernetes) require infrastructure provisioning, maintenance, security hardening, and monitoring
Managed Presto offerings like Starburst or Ahana offer enterprise features, support, and SLAs—but introduce subscription or consumption-based pricing

For teams with existing DevOps maturity or hybrid cloud needs, Presto can be cost-effective at scale, particularly when paired with spot instances or efficient autoscaling setups.

Total Cost Considerations:

Compute and storage (e.g., cloud VMs, object storage)
Engineering time and operational overhead
Optional managed service subscription (Starburst, Ahana)

BigQuery: Serverless with Transparent, Usage-Based Billing

BigQuery uses a serverless pricing model that simplifies infrastructure concerns but can lead to unpredictable costs without proper governance:

On-demand pricing: Pay per terabyte scanned ($5 per TB as of writing)
Flat-rate pricing: Reserved slots with a monthly commitment—better for high or predictable workloads
Storage costs: Charged separately for active and long-term storage

While BigQuery’s pricing is transparent, costs can escalate rapidly for inefficient queries, especially those that:

Scan unpartitioned or unclustered tables
Perform frequent joins across large datasets
Query external sources with federated access

Summary

Aspect	Presto	BigQuery
Software Cost	Free (open-source)	Included in usage pricing
Infra & Ops Cost	Varies by setup (self-hosted vs managed)	None (fully managed)
Pricing Model	BYOI (bring your own infrastructure)	On-demand (per TB) or flat-rate (slot reservation)
Cost Predictability	Moderate (if self-managed)	High (with proper monitoring & quotas)
Scalability Cost	Depends on autoscaling strategy	Auto-scales with usage-based charges

Presto vs BigQuery: Use Cases

Understanding the ideal scenarios for each platform helps clarify when to use Presto or BigQuery, based on your data architecture, workload patterns, and team preferences.

🔷 Ideal Use Cases for Presto

Presto excels in flexible, federated analytics. Its open architecture and connector-rich ecosystem make it ideal for querying data where it lives—without ETL.

Federated Queries Across Sources
Presto can query from Hive, S3, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Kafka, and many more—all within a single SQL query. Great for organizations that rely on data mesh or multi-platform storage.
Exploratory Analysis at Lower Cost
Since it’s open-source and you can scale it horizontally on your own infra, Presto is suitable for cost-sensitive analytics that require broad data access without moving everything into a centralized warehouse.
On-Prem or Multi-Cloud Environments
If you’re not fully in the cloud—or operate in multiple cloud providers—Presto gives you deployment flexibility across Kubernetes, VMs, or managed platforms like Starburst.

🔶 Ideal Use Cases for BigQuery

BigQuery is a powerhouse for centralized analytics in the Google Cloud ecosystem.

It’s serverless, scalable, and built for structured data processing at scale.

Cloud-Native Data Warehouse for Analytics
BigQuery shines when your data is already in GCP or you’ve adopted a lakehouse model using tools like Cloud Storage and Dataflow.
Real-Time Dashboards and BI
With support for BI Engine, materialized views, and integration with tools like Looker and Tableau, BigQuery is optimized for real-time dashboards and low-latency analytics.
Massively Scalable Batch Processing
Ideal for structured and semi-structured data, BigQuery handles petabyte-scale workloads and long-running ETL jobs with ease—without worrying about server provisioning.

In short:

Use Case Category	Presto	BigQuery
Federated Querying	✅ Strong support for diverse sources	⚠️ Limited; prefers centralized storage
Cloud-Native Architecture	⚠️ Requires external deployment or managed service	✅ Fully managed and tightly integrated with GCP
Real-Time Dashboards	✅ Possible (depends on infra)	✅ Built-in acceleration and BI Engine
Cost-Sensitive Exploration	✅ Open-source and flexible	⚠️ Usage-based billing can spike
Batch Data Processing	⚠️ Requires external scheduling tools	✅ First-class support for batch analytics

Presto vs BigQuery: Security and Compliance

Security and regulatory compliance are essential when choosing a data analytics platform—especially for teams in regulated industries or dealing with sensitive customer information.

🔷 Presto

Since Presto is open-source and self-managed (unless using a managed provider like Starburst or Ahana), its security features largely depend on how and where it’s deployed.

Pluggable Authentication
Presto supports integration with LDAP, Kerberos, OAuth, and custom authentication plugins. Starburst enhances this further with native enterprise-grade security options like SSO and SCIM.
Authorization
Presto supports SQL-based access controls, though it lacks built-in fine-grained row-level or column-level security unless extended via third-party solutions.
Data Encryption & Transport
Supports TLS for in-transit encryption and access control at the connector level, but storage-layer encryption is handled externally (e.g., via HDFS, S3, etc.).
Audit and Governance
No native auditing. You’ll need to pipe logs manually into tools like Elasticsearch or integrate with external governance platforms.

🔶 BigQuery

As a fully managed GCP product, BigQuery offers enterprise-grade security out of the box with tight integration into Google Cloud’s Identity and Access Management (IAM) framework.

Integrated IAM & Permissions
Granular permissions using Google Cloud IAM, with support for row-level access policies, column-level security, and dynamic data masking.
Encryption by Default
Data is encrypted at rest and in transit by default. Customers can bring their own encryption keys (CMEK) if needed.
Audit Logging
Native integration with Cloud Audit Logs, allowing detailed tracking of access and query behavior.
Compliance Certifications
BigQuery complies with major global standards including:
- HIPAA
- GDPR
- SOC 1/2/3
- ISO/IEC 27001
- FedRAMP

Feature	Presto	BigQuery
Authentication	Pluggable (LDAP, Kerberos, OAuth)	Native IAM
Access Controls	SQL-level; limited native governance	Fine-grained (row/column-level)
Encryption	Depends on storage layer (e.g., S3, HDFS)	Encrypted at rest and in transit by default
Auditing	Manual setup required	Built-in audit logging
Compliance Certifications	Depends on deployment provider	Full compliance with HIPAA, GDPR, SOC, ISO, etc.

Presto vs BigQuery: Pros and Cons

Both Presto and BigQuery are powerful tools for querying large datasets, but they serve different purposes and have distinct advantages and trade-offs.

Here’s a detailed breakdown to help teams evaluate based on their priorities:

🔷 Presto

Pros:

Open-source & Cost-Effective
No licensing fees. You only pay for infrastructure (unless using a managed service like Starburst).
Federated Querying Across Multiple Sources
Query data where it lives—on S3, Hive, MySQL, PostgreSQL, Kafka, and more—without needing to move it.
Highly Extensible & Flexible
Modular architecture with support for custom connectors and pluggable authentication.

Cons:

Requires Ongoing Management
Self-hosted setups demand DevOps expertise for cluster tuning, scaling, security, and monitoring.
No Native Storage or Caching
Acts as a compute-only engine; performance heavily depends on source system throughput and network latency.
Limited Built-in Governance
RBAC, auditing, and encryption features require third-party extensions or managed deployments.

🔶 BigQuery

Pros:

Fully Managed & Serverless
Zero infrastructure maintenance—Google handles provisioning, scaling, and tuning.
Excellent Performance at Scale
Optimized for structured and semi-structured data. Handles petabyte-scale datasets with ease.
Deep Integration with GCP Ecosystem
Seamlessly connects to tools like Looker, Dataflow, Cloud Functions, and Vertex AI.

Cons:

Costs Can Escalate
On-demand pricing based on data scanned can become expensive if queries aren’t optimized with partitioning and filters.
Limited Federated Querying
Supports external tables (e.g., in Cloud Storage or Bigtable), but not as broadly or flexibly as Presto.
Less Transparent Tuning Control
Automatic optimization is great, but limits low-level configuration for expert users.

Factor	Presto	BigQuery
Pricing Model	Open-source; infra costs only	Pay-per-query or flat-rate
Data Source Flexibility	Broad (many connectors)	Best with native BigQuery storage
Management Effort	High (self-hosted)	Low (fully managed)
Governance & Security	Requires extensions	Built-in, enterprise-ready
Best Fit For	Federated analytics at scale	Centralized, cloud-native analytics

Conclusion

As data teams evaluate tools to meet their analytical needs, the choice between Presto and BigQuery often boils down to one core consideration: flexibility vs. simplicity.

Presto is a powerful, open-source SQL engine purpose-built for federated querying across diverse and distributed data sources.

It gives teams full control over infrastructure and integration but requires engineering effort to scale, manage, and secure.

BigQuery, on the other hand, is a fully managed cloud data warehouse optimized for structured data and seamless integration with the Google Cloud ecosystem.

Its serverless architecture, built-in governance, and automatic performance tuning make it ideal for teams looking to move fast and scale effortlessly—at the expense of some flexibility and potential cost unpredictability.

Presto vs BigQuery: Final Recommendations

✅ Choose Presto if:
- You need to query across heterogeneous data sources without moving data
- You have infrastructure expertise and prefer an open-source stack
- Your workloads are exploratory, federated, or multi-cloud/on-prem
✅ Choose BigQuery if:
- You want a centralized, scalable data warehouse with minimal ops
- You’re already invested in Google Cloud
- Your use cases include real-time dashboards, structured data processing, or self-service BI

For many organizations, there may even be value in a hybrid approach—using Presto for cross-system queries and BigQuery as a performant central store for structured data.

Ultimately, the right choice depends on your data architecture, governance needs, and team capacity.

Presto vs BigQuery

Related Reading

Helpful Resources

What is Presto?

What is BigQuery?

Presto vs BigQuery: Architecture Comparison

Presto vs BigQuery: Performance

Presto Performance

BigQuery Performance

Summary

Presto vs BigQuery: Scalability

Presto Scalability

BigQuery Scalability

Summary

Presto vs BigQuery: Data Source Flexibility

Presto: Built for Federated Querying

BigQuery: Optimized for Native Storage

Summary

Presto vs BigQuery: Cost Model

Presto: Open-Source with Infrastructure Overhead

BigQuery: Serverless with Transparent, Usage-Based Billing

Summary

Presto vs BigQuery: Use Cases

🔷 Ideal Use Cases for Presto

🔶 Ideal Use Cases for BigQuery

Presto vs BigQuery: Security and Compliance

🔷 Presto

🔶 BigQuery

Presto vs BigQuery: Pros and Cons

🔷 Presto

🔶 BigQuery

Conclusion

Presto vs BigQuery: Final Recommendations

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply