Optimizing Kubernetes Resource Limits

Optimizing Kubernetes resource limits is a good idea for maintaining a healthy infrastructure.

In a Kubernetes environment, setting the right resource requests and limits for your containers isn’t just a best practice—it’s essential.

Kubernetes uses these values to schedule pods efficiently and ensure the cluster remains stable under varying loads.

Without proper configuration, applications may either hog resources and starve other workloads or get throttled and crash under pressure.

Poorly optimized resource settings can lead to a host of problems:

• Overprovisioning results in wasted CPU and memory, driving up cloud costs.

• Underprovisioning can cause throttling, pod evictions, and degraded performance.

• Unpredictable autoscaling behavior due to inconsistent metric baselines.

Why It Matters

When you optimize Kubernetes resource limits:

• Your applications run efficiently, consuming only what they need.

• You reduce infrastructure costs by minimizing waste.

• You improve cluster reliability and stability, especially under heavy workloads.

• You enable predictable autoscaling, allowing tools like HPA to function correctly.

Whether you’re running a multi-tenant production cluster or experimenting in a dev environment, optimizing resource usage ensures your Kubernetes workloads are both performant and cost-effective.

In this post, we’ll explore:

• How Kubernetes uses resource requests and limits

• Common pitfalls and anti-patterns

• Tools and strategies for tuning resource configurations

• Best practices for different workload types

For more Kubernetes tuning and observability insights, check out:

• HPA in Kubernetes

• Load Balancer for Kubernetes

• Datadog vs Grafana

And for deeper technical context, see:

• Kubernetes Official Docs: Resource Management

Let’s dive in and learn how to optimize your Kubernetes clusters for performance, reliability, and cost.

Understanding Kubernetes Resource Requests and Limits

Before you can optimize your Kubernetes workloads, it’s essential to understand how resource requests and limits work for CPU and memory (RAM).

These configurations directly influence pod scheduling, cluster performance, and even pod eviction behavior.

CPU and Memory Requests vs. Limits

• Requests are the minimum amount of CPU or memory a container is guaranteed to have. Kubernetes uses these values when scheduling pods to ensure that nodes have enough capacity.

• Limits are the maximum amount of CPU or memory a container is allowed to use. If a container tries to exceed this limit, different things happen depending on the resource type:

  • For CPU, the container is throttled.

  • For memory, the container is terminated if it exceeds the limit (OOMKilled).

Example:

In this example, Kubernetes will schedule the pod on a node that has at least 250 millicores of CPU and 512 MiB of memory available.

The container can burst up to 500 millicores and 1 GiB, but no more.

How Kubernetes Schedules Pods

Kubernetes uses resource requests during pod scheduling.

It looks at the requests (not limits) to determine if a node has enough available capacity.

This ensures fair resource allocation and avoids overloading nodes at the start.

However, if requests are set too low, your application may be scheduled successfully—but run into performance issues later if actual usage exceeds the available headroom.

Quality of Service (QoS) Classes and Pod Eviction

Kubernetes assigns QoS classes to pods based on how requests and limits are defined:

• Guaranteed: Pods with the same CPU/memory values for both requests and limits.

• Burstable: Pods with requests and limits set but not equal.

• BestEffort: Pods with no requests or limits.

These classes impact eviction behavior when a node is under memory pressure:

• Guaranteed pods are the last to be evicted.

• Burstable pods are next.

• BestEffort pods are evicted first.

Proper use of requests and limits helps ensure your critical workloads aren’t the first to be killed during resource contention.

Risks of Misconfigured Resource Limits

Misconfigured CPU and memory limits in Kubernetes can lead to significant performance, stability, and cost issues.

It’s important to strike a balance — not too high, not too low — to ensure optimal application and cluster performance.

Setting Limits Too Low

When CPU or memory limits are set too low, applications can suffer from:

• OOM Kills (Out of Memory Errors):
  If a container exceeds its memory limit, the Kubernetes runtime (typically the Linux kernel) will immediately terminate the process, leading to unexpected downtime or crash loops.

• CPU Throttling:
  If CPU usage surpasses the defined limit, Kubernetes will throttle the container. This can cause slow response times, missed deadlines in real-time processing, or degraded user experience.

• Unstable Applications:
  Applications might behave unpredictably when they’re starved of the resources they need to function properly.

Setting Limits Too High

Overprovisioning is also problematic:

• Wasted Resources:
  If you set memory and CPU limits much higher than what your app actually uses, the scheduler will reserve those resources unnecessarily, making them unavailable for other workloads.

• Reduced Cluster Efficiency:
  Nodes may appear full due to excessive reservations, preventing new pods from being scheduled — even if actual usage is low.

• Higher Infrastructure Costs:
  Over-allocating resources may lead to the need for larger or more nodes, increasing cloud or hardware costs unnecessarily.

The Goldilocks Zone: Not Too Much, Not Too Little

The goal is to configure resource limits that are just right for your workloads:

• Use historical metrics (from tools like Prometheus or Datadog) to understand typical and peak usage.

• Set requests to reflect typical usage and limits to accommodate reasonable spikes.

• Periodically review and adjust your configurations as workloads evolve.

By finding this balance, you maximize resource efficiency while maintaining performance and stability.

Strategies for Optimizing Resource Limits

Optimizing CPU and memory requests and limits in Kubernetes is an iterative process that blends observability, load testing, and automated tooling.

Below are key strategies to dial in the most effective configurations for your workloads.

Monitoring Actual Usage

To begin tuning your resource settings, it’s essential to monitor what your applications are actually consuming.

• Observability Tools:
  Use Prometheus, Grafana, or Datadog to track real-time and historical metrics for CPU and memory.

• What to Look For:

  • CPU Throttling: Indicates your CPU limit is too low.

  • OOM Kills: Suggest memory limits are too tight.

  • Idle Resources: Reveal overly generous allocations.

Tip: Visualizing resource usage over time helps spot trends and anomalies that raw numbers can miss.

Setting Baselines with Load Testing

Before your workloads go into production — or when planning for scale — simulate real-world traffic to understand performance boundaries.

• Tools to Use:

  • k6 for modern, scriptable load testing

  • Locust for Python-based, distributed load tests

  • Apache JMeter for legacy or enterprise-heavy scenarios

• Goals of Load Testing:

  • Identify CPU and memory peaks under expected traffic.

  • Measure latency and response times under stress.

  • Gather metrics to inform realistic request/limit values.

Using Historical Metrics for Adjustment

Over time, Kubernetes environments accumulate valuable usage data that can drive smarter resource allocation.

• Kubernetes Metrics Server:
  Provides real-time resource usage to feed into Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) and custom dashboards.

• Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA):
  Automatically recommends or updates CPU/memory settings based on historical data. Useful for workloads with fluctuating needs.

• Goldilocks:
  An open-source tool that audits current pod resource settings and provides suggestions for better efficiency.

By combining active monitoring, simulation, and automation, teams can maintain optimal resource limits — ensuring application performance while minimizing waste and cost.

Automating Optimization with VPA and Goldilocks

Manual tuning of Kubernetes resource limits can be time-consuming and error-prone, especially in dynamic environments.

Automation tools like Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA) and Goldilocks help streamline and standardize resource optimization by leveraging real-world usage data.

Overview of Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA)

Vertical Pod Autoscaler automatically adjusts the CPU and memory requests and limits for your pods based on observed usage over time.

It’s best suited for workloads with unpredictable or variable resource requirements.

• How VPA Works:

  • Monitors resource usage using metrics-server.

  • Provides recommendations or can auto-apply new values.

  • Works in three modes:

    • Off: Only generates recommendations.

    • Initial: Sets resources at pod creation.

    • Auto: Continuously updates running pods (requires pod restarts).

• Use Cases:

  • Batch jobs

  • Background workers

  • Non-latency-sensitive services

Note: VPA does not work well with HPA when scaling on CPU/memory, as they can conflict.

How Goldilocks Recommends Optimal Request/Limit Values

Goldilocks is a popular open-source tool that helps you right-size your Kubernetes workloads.

It wraps VPA and presents clear recommendations in an easy-to-read dashboard.

• Features:

  • Deploys VPA in Off mode to gather recommendations.

  • Visualizes optimal requests/limits per namespace or deployment.

  • Classifies configurations as under-provisioned, over-provisioned, or just right (hence the name).

• Benefits:

  • Helps reduce cloud spend by minimizing resource over-allocation.

  • Improves pod scheduling and cluster efficiency.

  • No guesswork—uses real data.

Best Practices for Safely Rolling Out Automated Adjustments

1. Start in Recommendation Mode
   Use VPA in Off mode or Goldilocks for a period (e.g., 1–2 weeks) to gather baseline usage data.

2. Review Recommendations
   Cross-check suggested values against application behavior and SLAs. Be especially cautious with latency-sensitive workloads.

3. Apply Gradually
   Roll out updates during low-traffic periods and monitor performance. Consider using canary deployments or feature flags.

4. Monitor Closely
   After applying new limits, watch for signs of under-provisioning (e.g., CPU throttling, OOM kills) and adjust as needed.

5. Document & Automate
   Use GitOps tools like Argo CD or Flux to version and manage changes to resource limits across environments.

Automating optimization with VPA and Goldilocks brings precision to Kubernetes resource management — leading to more reliable, efficient, and scalable applications.

Resource Optimization Across Environments

Resource optimization isn’t a one-size-fits-all strategy—what works in production may not suit development or staging.

Each environment has unique performance needs, usage patterns, and risk tolerances.

Understanding these differences is key to setting realistic and effective CPU and memory limits.

Differences in Tuning for Dev, Staging, and Production

Development (Dev)

• Primary Goal: Fast feedback cycles, minimal cost.

• Approach:

  • Use lower resource requests/limits to maximize cluster density.

  • Allow for some overcommitment since availability isn’t mission-critical.

  • Optional: Skip limits entirely for local clusters or sandboxed namespaces.

• Tips:

  • Set lower thresholds for Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) if used.

  • Prioritize developer agility over strict performance guarantees.

Staging

• Primary Goal: Production-like testing environment.

• Approach:

  • Mirror production settings closely—but on a smaller scale.

  • Use representative data loads and traffic to test autoscaling behaviors.

  • Maintain resource headroom for load testing and pre-deployment checks.

• Tips:

  • Run load tests to validate production tuning assumptions.

  • Monitor for flapping and stability issues during scale-up/down scenarios.

Production

• Primary Goal: High availability, reliability, and efficiency.

• Approach:

  • Apply carefully tuned resource requests and limits based on live traffic.

  • Implement autoscaling (HPA, VPA) for dynamic load handling.

  • Reserve buffer capacity for spikes, deployments, and failures.

• Tips:

  • Continuously monitor with observability tools (e.g., Datadog vs. Grafana).

  • Combine pod scaling with Cluster Autoscaler for infrastructure responsiveness.

Cluster Size, Node Types, and Workload Variability Considerations

• Cluster Size: Larger clusters can handle overprovisioning more gracefully, but require tighter tuning for cost efficiency.

• Node Types: Different VM types (e.g., compute-optimized vs. memory-optimized) should influence your resource strategy.

• Workload Variability:

  • Stable workloads (e.g., cron jobs, batch processing): Use fixed resources or VPA.

  • Dynamic workloads (e.g., web apps): Leverage HPA and buffer limits for performance spikes.

By tailoring resource optimization to each environment and accounting for infrastructure diversity, teams can reduce costs, improve reliability, and streamline deployment workflows.

Cost Optimization and Cloud Provider Considerations

Resource optimization in Kubernetes isn’t just about performance—it’s a crucial part of managing and minimizing your cloud spend.

Whether you’re running clusters on AWS, GCP, Azure, or another provider, intelligent resource allocation directly translates to real savings.

How Resource Optimization Reduces Cloud Costs

Every over-provisioned pod consumes more CPU and memory than necessary, which can lead to:

• Larger nodes than required.

• Underutilized infrastructure (e.g., nodes with lots of free space that can’t be reclaimed).

• Increased costs for memory-intensive workloads, which tend to be priced higher.

By tuning your pod requests and limits:

• You enable better bin packing (i.e., more pods per node).

• Reduce the number of EC2/GCE/Azure VM instances required.

• Free up unused capacity for autoscaling or bursting workloads.

Spot Instances, Node Autoscaling, and Bin Packing Strategies

Spot/Preemptible Instances

• Cloud providers offer discounted instances (e.g., AWS Spot, GCP Preemptible) that can save up to 90%.

• Use them for stateless or fault-tolerant workloads where interruption is acceptable.

• Combine with taints/tolerations and node affinity to isolate spot workloads.

Cluster Autoscaler

• The Cluster Autoscaler automatically adjusts the number of nodes based on pending pods.

• Effective only when resource requests are accurate—underestimated requests can lead to throttling, while overestimates cause idle nodes.

• Combine with Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) to scale both pods and infrastructure in sync.

Bin Packing

• Bin packing refers to fitting pods onto nodes as efficiently as possible.

• Use tools like Karpenter (AWS) or GKE Autopilot (GCP) to optimize node provisioning.

• Smaller pod resource footprints allow tighter packing, especially for memory-bound nodes.

Final Notes

Cloud cost optimization in Kubernetes isn’t just about cutting corners—it’s about right-sizing your applications.

When done correctly, you:

• Maximize infrastructure utilization

• Ensure performance and availability

• Keep cloud bills predictable and manageable

  ---

  Best Practices Summary

  Optimizing Kubernetes resource limits is not a one-time task—it’s an ongoing practice that balances performance, stability, and cost.

  Here’s a summary of best practices to help you maintain efficient workloads across environments:

  🔄 Regular Review of Usage Metrics

  • Continuously monitor CPU and memory usage to understand baseline behavior and detect anomalies.

  • Use tools like Prometheus, Grafana, or Datadog to visualize trends and identify under- or over-provisioned pods.

  • Set up alerts for resource anomalies, such as excessive throttling or high OOM kill rates.

  📌 Tip: Include dashboards in your regular SRE/DevOps review cadence to catch issues early.

  ⚖️ Combining HPA and VPA for Dynamic Autoscaling

  • Use Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) to scale pods based on demand (CPU, memory, or custom metrics).

  • Use Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA) to suggest or adjust resource limits dynamically based on observed usage.

  • Ensure proper configuration and boundaries (e.g., min/max replicas or upper/lower resource caps) to prevent instability.

  🧠 Pro Tip: If using both HPA and VPA together, ensure HPA scales on custom metrics rather than CPU/memory to avoid conflict.

  📚 Documenting and Versioning Resource Configurations

  • Treat resource configurations like code—document rationale for request/limit values.

  • Use GitOps or CI/CD pipelines to manage and track changes to resource specs.

  • Maintain environment-specific manifests (e.g., dev, staging, prod) with tailored resource settings.

  🛠️ Tools like Kustomize and Helm can simplify configuration management across environments.

  By following these best practices, you create a feedback loop that continuously improves workload efficiency, reliability, and cost management.

  This is essential for growing teams and scaling systems in cloud-native environments.

  ---

  Conclusion

  In a Kubernetes environment, resource optimization is not just about saving money—it’s about maintaining a healthy, scalable, and high-performing infrastructure.

  Poorly configured resource limits can lead to instability, application crashes, and wasted compute power.

  On the other hand, thoughtful, metrics-driven tuning ensures your workloads are resilient, efficient, and cost-effective.

  Why Resource Optimization Is Essential

  • Prevents overprovisioning and underutilization, which inflate cloud costs unnecessarily.

  • Avoids performance degradation, such as CPU throttling or memory OOM kills.

  • Enables auto-scaling features like HPA and VPA to work more effectively.

  • Helps maintain predictable performance across dev, staging, and production environments.

  Adopt a Metrics-Driven Approach

  The key to success lies in observability. Use tools like:

  • Prometheus and Grafana for real-time metrics and dashboards

  • Goldilocks for recommendations on resource limits

  • Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA) for automated adjustments

  • k6 or Apache JMeter for load testing

  Start small, experiment, monitor, and iterate.

  Further Reading & Internal Resources

  • ✅ HPA in Kubernetes – Dive deeper into Horizontal Pod Autoscaling

  • ✅ Kubernetes Scale Deployment – Best practices for scaling apps

  • 🔗 Kubernetes Official Documentation – Managing Resources

  • 🔗 Fairwinds Goldilocks GitHub

  Final Tip: Make resource tuning a part of your development and deployment lifecycle.

  It’s one of the easiest ways to improve stability and reduce cloud bills without changing a single line of business logic.