New Relic vs LogicMonitor? Which is better?
In today’s fast-moving digital world, monitoring and observability are no longer optional — they are essential for ensuring performance, uptime, and customer satisfaction.
Organizations rely heavily on advanced tools to gain real-time visibility across their infrastructure, applications, and networks.
Two major players in this space are New Relic and LogicMonitor.
New Relic is a full-stack observability platform offering application performance monitoring (APM), infrastructure monitoring, logs, synthetics, and real user monitoring (RUM) — all in one unified experience.
LogicMonitor, meanwhile, is known for its agentless infrastructure monitoring, network observability, and cloud monitoring, focusing heavily on hybrid IT environments.
In this detailed comparison of New Relic vs LogicMonitor, we’ll break down their core features, use cases, pricing models, integrations, and more.
By the end, you’ll know which platform aligns better with your DevOps, SRE, or IT operations needs.
If you’re interested in other related comparisons, check out our posts on New Relic vs Datadog and Dynatrace vs New Relic.
What is New Relic?
New Relic is a leading full-stack observability platform that empowers engineering, DevOps, and IT teams to monitor, debug, and optimize their entire software ecosystem.
Designed for modern cloud-native environments, New Relic provides deep visibility across applications, infrastructure, logs, real user experiences, and synthetic monitoring — all within a unified platform.
At its core, New Relic offers:
Application Performance Monitoring (APM): Deep performance insights into code-level transactions and bottlenecks.
Infrastructure Monitoring: Real-time observability for cloud services, servers, containers, and Kubernetes clusters.
Log Management: Centralized log aggregation, search, and analysis without the need for separate tools.
Real User Monitoring (RUM): Understand how actual users experience your applications, with metrics like page load time and error rates.
Synthetic Monitoring: Automated testing of endpoints and APIs to catch issues before users are impacted.
Additionally, New Relic provides a powerful telemetry data platform that collects, stores, and analyzes trillions of events daily. It offers real-time analytics with customizable dashboards, alerting, and anomaly detection powered by machine learning.
Thanks to its strong support for OpenTelemetry, New Relic is a flexible solution that adapts to virtually any technology stack.
Related: Learn how New Relic compares to Datadog if you’re evaluating multiple observability platforms.
What is LogicMonitor?
LogicMonitor is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring platform designed to provide deep visibility into servers, networks, cloud services, and applications — all through an agentless monitoring approach.
It’s built for IT operations teams that need a reliable way to ensure the health and performance of their environments without deploying heavy or invasive agents across systems.
LogicMonitor focuses on:
Infrastructure Monitoring: Keep tabs on servers, storage, virtualization platforms, databases, and more — whether on-premises or in the cloud.
Network Monitoring: Visualize network traffic, device status, and performance metrics across routers, switches, firewalls, and load balancers.
Cloud Monitoring: Native integrations with AWS, Azure, and GCP to monitor cloud resources alongside traditional data center infrastructure.
Application Monitoring: Monitor application services, though its strength lies more in systems and device observability than deep code-level insights.
One of LogicMonitor’s key differentiators is its agentless monitoring model, which relies on protocols like SNMP, WMI, and APIs to gather data, making it easier and faster to set up in many enterprise environments.
This is particularly attractive for teams managing large-scale hybrid infrastructures.
Additionally, LogicMonitor offers automated device discovery, predictive alerting, and customizable dashboards, allowing IT teams to proactively prevent downtime and optimize resource utilization.
You might also want to check our guide on Load Balancer for Kubernetes if you’re expanding your monitoring to cloud-native setups.
New Relic vs LogicMonitor: Feature Comparison
When comparing New Relic and LogicMonitor, it’s important to recognize that while both platforms offer strong monitoring capabilities, they target slightly different needs.
Here’s a breakdown of how they compare feature-by-feature:
Feature | New Relic | LogicMonitor |
---|---|---|
Observability | Full-stack observability: APM, infrastructure, logs, synthetics, RUM, and telemetry data platform | Primarily infrastructure, network, and cloud monitoring |
Deployment | Cloud-native, with agents installed on monitored systems | Agentless monitoring with optional lightweight collectors |
Cloud Integration | Strong integrations with AWS, Azure, GCP, Kubernetes | Native multi-cloud monitoring for AWS, Azure, GCP |
Application Monitoring (APM) | Deep code-level APM, distributed tracing, service maps | Basic application service monitoring (not deep APM) |
Network Monitoring | Limited (via integrations) | Comprehensive network device and traffic monitoring |
Security Monitoring | Available through New Relic Vulnerability Management and add-ons | Focuses on infrastructure and operational health, not security |
Ease of Setup | Moderate (requires agents and configuration) | Easier for infrastructure-only setups due to agentless design |
Dashboards and Visualization | Highly customizable, real-time dashboards with advanced telemetry visualizations | Pre-configured dashboards for common devices and cloud resources |
Alerting | Flexible alerting based on any telemetry signal | Intelligent alerting with thresholds, anomaly detection, and predictive insights |
In summary:
New Relic shines for application performance monitoring and deep full-stack observability.
LogicMonitor excels at IT infrastructure, network monitoring, and cloud visibility without needing extensive configuration.
If you’re primarily concerned with application performance and end-user experience, New Relic will likely fit better.
If you’re focused on ensuring your IT infrastructure, networks, and cloud services stay healthy, LogicMonitor could be the smarter choice.
Related: Explore Grafana vs Tableau for advanced dashboarding options.
New Relic vs LogicMonitor: Core Strengths Comparison
Choosing between New Relic and LogicMonitor often comes down to what you need to monitor most.
Here’s a closer look at their core strengths:
New Relic Core Strengths
Application Performance Monitoring (APM):
New Relic offers deep insights into application health, tracing transactions down to the code level to quickly identify bottlenecks and errors.End-to-End Observability:
It provides a unified view across applications, infrastructure, logs, real user monitoring (RUM), and synthetic tests, enabling teams to trace issues across their entire tech stack.Real-Time User Tracking:
New Relic captures real-time user interactions, offering actionable metrics on customer experiences, application responsiveness, and browser performance.
If your primary goal is application health, performance optimization, and full-stack visibility, New Relic delivers one of the most comprehensive solutions in the industry.
LogicMonitor Core Strengths
Network Device Monitoring:
LogicMonitor specializes in deep network insights, including routers, switches, firewalls, and other critical devices — crucial for IT and enterprise operations.Hybrid Infrastructure Management:
Whether you’re running resources on-premises, in the cloud, or in a hybrid environment, LogicMonitor’s agentless collectors allow seamless and centralized monitoring.Automated Discovery and Configuration:
LogicMonitor excels at automatically detecting devices, services, and dependencies without extensive manual setup, making it easy to scale infrastructure monitoring.
If your organization leans heavily on infrastructure reliability, network uptime, and device visibility, LogicMonitor offers robust, low-maintenance solutions.
New Relic vs LogicMonitor: Ease of Use
When evaluating New Relic vs LogicMonitor, ease of use can significantly impact how quickly your team can get value from the platform.
New Relic Ease of Use
Feature-Rich, But Requires Setup:
New Relic offers an incredibly rich feature set across APM, infrastructure, logs, synthetics, and more. However, to fully optimize the platform, users often need to invest time in configuring agents, setting up alert policies, defining service maps, and fine-tuning dashboards.Best Practices Setup:
New Relic encourages following observability best practices like telemetry pipelines and custom instrumentation, which can create a steeper learning curve — but ultimately leads to powerful, customized observability once properly configured.
LogicMonitor Ease of Use
Faster Time-to-Value:
LogicMonitor is designed for rapid deployment, especially in traditional IT, network, and hybrid cloud environments. Its agentless collectors and automated discovery mean many systems and devices are monitored almost immediately after setup.Minimal Configuration Needed:
Especially for infrastructure and network monitoring, LogicMonitor offers pre-configured templates, built-in dashboards, and intelligent alerting out-of-the-box, significantly reducing setup overhead compared to New Relic.
Summary:
If you want quick deployment for IT and network monitoring, LogicMonitor might feel easier out of the gate.
If you need deep application and telemetry observability, New Relic offers more customization but requires a more deliberate setup phase.
New Relic vs LogicMonitor: Pricing Overview
Understanding pricing is critical when deciding between New Relic vs LogicMonitor, as the cost structure can impact scalability and long-term value.
New Relic Pricing
Free Tier Available:
New Relic offers a generous free tier that includes basic access to APM, infrastructure monitoring, and custom dashboards, ideal for smaller teams or testing the platform.Paid Plans:
New Relic’s pricing primarily revolves around two variables:Data ingestion volume (measured in GBs ingested per month)
Number of users (basic users vs full users with advanced capabilities)
While flexible, costs can scale rapidly if your telemetry data grows significantly.
Usage-Based Flexibility:
Great for cloud-native teams that need to monitor large numbers of services without strict device-based limits, but budgeting requires careful monitoring of data ingestion rates.
LogicMonitor Pricing
Device-Based Pricing:
LogicMonitor’s pricing is primarily based on the number of monitored devices or resources (e.g., servers, routers, cloud instances). This approach can be more predictable for organizations focused on IT infrastructure.Enterprise Customization:
For larger environments, LogicMonitor offers tailored enterprise plans, including volume discounts and dedicated support options.No Public Pricing:
Exact pricing typically requires contacting their sales team for a customized quote, especially for hybrid and multi-cloud setups.
Summary:
Choose New Relic if you prefer a usage-based model optimized for telemetry-heavy environments.
Choose LogicMonitor if you want predictable, device-based pricing for IT and hybrid infrastructure monitoring.
New Relic vs LogicMonitor: Integration Ecosystem
When comparing New Relic vs LogicMonitor, integration capabilities play a major role in determining how well each tool fits into your existing technology stack.
New Relic Integrations
Cloud Providers:
Seamless integrations with AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, and more, enabling real-time cloud resource monitoring and deep telemetry.SaaS Applications:
Out-of-the-box support for monitoring applications like Salesforce, Slack, and ServiceNow.Kubernetes and Containers:
Strong integrations with Kubernetes (including native K8s observability), Docker, and containerized environments.CI/CD Pipelines:
Ties into tools like Jenkins, GitHub Actions, and CircleCI to provide observability across the development and deployment lifecycle.Custom APIs and Extensions:
New Relic offers APIs and SDKs for creating custom telemetry data pipelines, making it highly extensible for bespoke environments.
LogicMonitor Integrations
Networking Equipment:
Excellent native support for major network vendors like Cisco, Juniper, Arista, and others, making it ideal for traditional IT operations.Servers and Storage Systems:
Direct monitoring capabilities for Dell EMC, HPE, NetApp, and a wide variety of physical and virtualized storage systems.Cloud Infrastructure:
Integrates with AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud to monitor cloud resources, although with slightly less emphasis on deep telemetry compared to New Relic.ITSM and Collaboration Tools:
Supports integration with platforms like ServiceNow, PagerDuty, and Slack for streamlined incident management and communication.
Summary:
Choose New Relic if you need extensive, deep integrations across modern cloud-native and DevOps ecosystems.
Choose LogicMonitor if your priority is visibility into traditional IT infrastructure, networks, and hybrid environments.
New Relic vs LogicMonitor: Pros and Cons
Choosing between New Relic and LogicMonitor comes down to the specific needs of your organization.
Here’s a breakdown of each platform’s advantages and drawbacks:
New Relic Pros:
Best-in-class APM capabilities:
Provides deep insights into application performance, code-level tracing, and real-time issue detection.
End-to-end visibility (frontend + backend):
Offers complete observability across user experience (RUM), applications, infrastructure, and third-party services.
Real-time analytics and powerful dashboards:
Highly customizable dashboards and robust analytics help teams spot patterns, troubleshoot faster, and optimize systems proactively.
New Relic Cons:
❌ Can be costly with heavy data ingestion:
As data volumes grow, New Relic’s pricing model can lead to unexpected costs.
❌ Steeper learning curve for beginners:
Teams new to observability may need time to fully utilize New Relic’s advanced features and telemetry capabilities.
LogicMonitor Pros:
Strong infrastructure and network monitoring:
Exceptional at monitoring network devices, physical/virtual servers, and hybrid cloud environments.
Agentless monitoring with fast deployment:
Reduces setup complexity, offering quicker time-to-value for many organizations.
Auto-discovery of devices and resources:
Automatically detects new devices on the network, making scaling and management easier.
LogicMonitor Cons:
❌ Limited APM functionality:
Lacks the in-depth application performance management features that New Relic provides.
❌ UI can feel overwhelming for large environments:
While powerful, the LogicMonitor interface can become cluttered and harder to navigate in very large deployments.
New Relic vs LogicMonitor: Which One Should You Choose?
Deciding between New Relic and LogicMonitor comes down to your organization’s monitoring priorities:
Choose New Relic if:
You prioritize application performance monitoring, full-stack observability, and advanced analytics.
New Relic excels in environments where application uptime, responsiveness, and user experience are critical.Your teams need developer-centric tools (APM, RUM, Synthetics).
If you require code-level tracing, real-user monitoring, and proactive synthetic testing, New Relic delivers a powerful toolkit built with developers and DevOps teams in mind.
Choose LogicMonitor if:
You focus on hybrid IT, network device monitoring, and traditional server infrastructure.
LogicMonitor shines when your primary needs revolve around monitoring routers, switches, servers, storage, and cloud-connected systems.You need fast deployment without installing agents everywhere.
With its agentless architecture and auto-discovery features, LogicMonitor is ideal for IT teams seeking quick, efficient rollout with minimal overhead.
Conclusion
When it comes to New Relic vs LogicMonitor, the right choice depends entirely on your monitoring needs.
New Relic is the better fit if your priority is full-stack application observability, performance optimization, and deep user experience insights.
It’s a developer-centric platform built for modern, cloud-native environments.
LogicMonitor, on the other hand, excels at infrastructure and network monitoring, offering strong visibility into hybrid environments with minimal setup thanks to its agentless approach.
If you’re still unsure, both platforms offer free trials — making it easy to test their features in your own environment before committing.
Whichever you choose, investing in a powerful monitoring solution is key to maintaining performance, reliability, and growth.
Be First to Comment