Dynatrace vs New Relic? Which is better for you?
In today’s cloud-native, microservices-driven world, observability is more than just a buzzword — it’s a cornerstone of effective DevOps and Site Reliability Engineering (SRE) practices.
As organizations scale and adopt distributed systems, the need for actionable insights across application performance, infrastructure health, and user behavior becomes critical.
Two of the most recognized players in this space are Dynatrace and New Relic.
Both platforms offer full-stack observability solutions, robust APM (Application Performance Monitoring) features, and support for modern telemetry standards.
However, they differ significantly in their approach, user experience, pricing models, and strengths in specific use cases.
In this post, we’ll dive into a detailed comparison of Dynatrace vs New Relic, helping you understand:
Key features and capabilities of each platform
Performance, scalability, and ease of use
Pricing structures and use case suitability
Which tool is better suited for your team’s needs
Whether you’re evaluating tools for your first observability stack or considering switching providers, this guide will help you make a more informed decision.
Recommended Reading:
External Resources:
Let’s explore how these two observability giants stack up.
Overview of Dynatrace
Dynatrace has evolved significantly since its inception in 2005, transitioning from a traditional APM solution to a cutting-edge observability platform.
Over the years, Dynatrace has rearchitected its platform to meet the needs of modern, cloud-native environments, and today, it’s recognized as one of the most advanced AI-powered monitoring solutions in the market.
Core Capabilities
At its core, Dynatrace provides full-stack observability, covering everything from application performance and infrastructure monitoring to user experience and security analytics.
Key capabilities include:
Davis AI: An AI-powered engine that automatically detects anomalies, pinpoints root causes, and helps reduce alert fatigue with precise context.
Automatic Discovery & Dependency Mapping: Dynatrace maps out your entire technology stack — containers, microservices, cloud infrastructure — without manual configuration.
Code-Level Visibility: Deep transaction tracing down to individual lines of code.
Unified Data Platform: Combines metrics, logs, traces, and events in a single platform for holistic insights.
Key Strengths and Unique Selling Points
AI-Driven Observability: Davis AI gives Dynatrace a major edge in proactive incident detection and automated troubleshooting.
Autonomous Cloud Monitoring: With OneAgent, Dynatrace auto-discovers and instruments your entire environment with minimal setup.
Smart Dependency Graphing: Its Smartscape technology visualizes your environment in real-time, helping teams quickly understand service relationships.
Security Capabilities: Application security monitoring is built-in, offering vulnerability detection across your code, libraries, and containers.
Dynatrace shines in large-scale, dynamic environments — particularly for enterprises that prioritize automation, deep intelligence, and zero-touch configuration.
Overview of New Relic
New Relic has been a key player in the application performance monitoring (APM) space since 2008.
Initially focused on providing deep insights into application health, New Relic has since transformed into a comprehensive observability platform through its unified offering: New Relic One.
Platform Background and New Relic One
With the launch of New Relic One, the company shifted toward a full-stack, telemetry-focused approach.
This transition modernized its architecture, embraced OpenTelemetry, and introduced a flexible, consumption-based pricing model — positioning New Relic as a strong contender in today’s observability ecosystem.
Core Capabilities
New Relic One offers a unified observability experience with the following core features:
APM (Application Performance Monitoring): Deep diagnostics with transaction traces, error analytics, and service maps.
Infrastructure Monitoring: Real-time visibility into servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure.
Log Management: Centralized logging with correlation to traces and metrics.
Synthetic Monitoring: Simulated user interactions to proactively test uptime and performance.
Distributed Tracing: End-to-end visibility across microservices environments.
Unique Strengths
OpenTelemetry-Native: New Relic embraces open standards, making it easier to integrate with modern toolchains without vendor lock-in.
Flexible Pricing Model: Usage-based pricing allows teams to monitor everything without worrying about host-based limits — particularly appealing for startups and small teams.
Developer-Centric UX: Offers powerful dashboards, customizable charts, and a built-in telemetry data platform with New Relic Query Language (NRQL).
New Relic’s ease of use, open-source alignment, and transparent pricing make it a great option for teams looking to quickly gain observability without heavy configuration.
Feature Comparison: Dynatrace vs New Relic
Both Dynatrace and New Relic offer robust observability solutions, but they differ significantly in how they approach monitoring, automation, and data visualization.
Here’s a side-by-side breakdown of key features across core observability domains:
| Feature | Dynatrace | New Relic |
|---|---|---|
| APM (Application Performance Monitoring) | Auto-instrumentation with code-level insights and Davis AI for root cause analysis | Deep APM with flexible instrumentation and NRQL-based custom queries |
| Infrastructure Monitoring | Full-stack, including cloud, hosts, containers, networks with Smartscape topology | Strong coverage for hosts, cloud services, and containers |
| AI & Anomaly Detection | Davis AI: Automated baselining, anomaly detection, and root cause analysis | Basic anomaly detection, customizable alerts, integrated with alerting tools |
| Log Management | Integrated log analytics (less mature than other areas) | Centralized logs with direct correlation to traces and metrics |
| Dashboards & Visualization | Prescriptive, automated dashboards with Smartscape visual topology | Fully customizable dashboards using widgets and NRQL |
| Synthetic Monitoring | Advanced capabilities with browser and API monitoring | Synthetics with configurable uptime and user flows |
| Distributed Tracing | Native tracing across full-stack with automatic service detection | OpenTelemetry-based distributed tracing across services |
| Security Monitoring | Runtime Application Protection (RASP), vulnerability detection | Available through New Relic Vulnerability Management and integrations |
| Deployment Model | Primarily SaaS with OneAgent deployed across environment | SaaS-based with agent-based and OpenTelemetry ingestion |
| Ease of Use | Highly automated with minimal manual setup | Requires more manual configuration but offers high flexibility |
Key Takeaways
Dynatrace stands out in automation and AI-powered root cause analysis, making it ideal for enterprises seeking hands-off observability with intelligent alerts.
New Relic excels in flexibility, OpenTelemetry adoption, and affordable pricing for smaller teams looking to build tailored observability stacks.
Both tools are powerful, but they cater to slightly different user personas and organizational needs.
Dynatrace leans toward automation-heavy enterprise ops teams, while New Relic offers more DIY customization for modern DevOps workflows.
Dynatrace vs New Relic: Ease of Use & Deployment
When selecting an observability platform, ease of setup and day-to-day usability play a major role—especially for teams without dedicated SREs or platform engineers.
Here’s how Dynatrace and New Relic compare in terms of installation, learning curve, and dashboard experience:
🛠 Installation & Agent Setup
Dynatrace offers a streamlined deployment process via its OneAgent, which automatically discovers services, dependencies, and telemetry across your stack. It requires minimal configuration post-install, and coverage spans everything from infrastructure to user experience monitoring.
New Relic, on the other hand, uses a modular agent model. While this provides more control over what you instrument, it also requires more manual setup—especially if you’re deploying across hybrid environments. However, with New Relic’s guided install and growing OpenTelemetry support, the process has become smoother over time.
📘 Learning Curve for Teams
Dynatrace is known for being extremely beginner-friendly after deployment. Thanks to Davis AI and Smartscape (its real-time topology map), users can immediately understand application health and dependencies without needing to dive into configuration.
New Relic provides extensive observability power, but it requires more user intervention to get the most out of it. The learning curve can be steeper for less technical users, especially when using New Relic Query Language (NRQL) to build custom views or alerts.
📊 UI and Dashboard Flexibility
Dynatrace leans toward prescriptive dashboards—you get auto-generated visualizations that are useful out of the box but less customizable. Its Smartscape and Problem cards give intuitive, high-level overviews of your environment.
New Relic offers more dashboarding flexibility. Users can create fully custom dashboards, explore their data using NRQL, and integrate widgets from different data sources. This makes it powerful for advanced teams but potentially overwhelming for new users.
Summary:
Choose Dynatrace if you want a fast, automated setup with minimal configuration and a guided UI.
Go with New Relic if you prefer high customization, fine-grained control, and don’t mind spending more time setting things up.
Dynatrace vs New Relic: AI and Automation Capabilities
AI-driven observability is transforming how DevOps and SRE teams identify, resolve, and even prevent issues in modern systems.
Both Dynatrace and New Relic offer intelligent automation and anomaly detection, but they differ in depth and approach.
🤖 Dynatrace’s Davis AI
Dynatrace sets itself apart with its proprietary Davis AI engine, a real-time, context-aware AI that automates:
Root-cause analysis: Davis doesn’t just detect anomalies—it traces them to their origin by analyzing dependencies across services, hosts, containers, and even user sessions.
Predictive analytics: Davis uses baselining and behavioral analysis to detect issues before they impact users, helping teams proactively resolve problems.
Smart alerting: Davis reduces alert noise by correlating events into a single root problem, which significantly decreases mean time to resolution (MTTR).
This makes Dynatrace especially powerful in complex, distributed systems where pinpointing the source of an issue manually can be time-consuming.
🔔 New Relic’s Anomaly Detection and Alerting
New Relic offers intelligent alerting features through Lookout, Applied Intelligence (AI), and anomaly detection models. These tools enable:
Anomaly detection: New Relic applies machine learning to baseline performance and automatically surfaces abnormal behavior in services, infrastructure, and custom metrics.
Correlation and alert tuning: The platform can auto-suppress related incidents, helping reduce alert fatigue. Teams can also configure dynamic thresholds based on historical trends.
NRQL-powered conditions: For more advanced users, custom alert conditions can be created using New Relic Query Language, providing precision monitoring.
While not as “hands-free” or visually intuitive as Davis AI, New Relic’s approach offers more control and customization for teams that prefer a tailored alerting experience.
Summary:
Choose Dynatrace for an AI-first, automated root-cause detection engine that works out of the box.
Opt for New Relic if you prefer customizable anomaly detection with rich query capabilities.
Dynatrace vs New Relic: Integrations & Ecosystem
When choosing an observability platform, integration capabilities are critical for ensuring seamless visibility across your infrastructure, applications, and services.
Both Dynatrace and New Relic offer extensive ecosystems, but they differ in their approach to supported platforms, OpenTelemetry adoption, and marketplace depth.
🔌 Supported Platforms and Services
Dynatrace supports a wide range of technologies out of the box including Kubernetes, AWS, Azure, GCP, VMware, Red Hat OpenShift, and more.
New Relic offers similarly broad support, with integrations for cloud services, serverless platforms, container orchestration tools, and DevOps pipelines.
Both tools offer automatic discovery and instrumentation for services, though Dynatrace’s OneAgent excels in detecting and mapping dependencies without manual config.
🌐 OpenTelemetry and Vendor Neutrality
New Relic is a strong proponent of OpenTelemetry, making it an excellent choice for teams that want to adopt open standards and avoid vendor lock-in. It supports ingesting OpenTelemetry data natively across all observability domains.
Dynatrace has OpenTelemetry support as well, but its ecosystem is more closely tied to its proprietary OneAgent and built-in data model, offering tighter automation in exchange for less flexibility with external formats.
For teams prioritizing open-source observability stacks, New Relic’s OpenTelemetry support may be more attractive.
🛍️ Plugin Marketplaces and Ecosystem Depth
Dynatrace Hub offers hundreds of pre-built integrations and extensions, especially for enterprise-scale technologies and services. It emphasizes automation and zero-config deployments.
New Relic Instant Observability (I/O) provides quick-start packs, dashboards, and instrumentation scripts for over 500 technologies, with strong support for developers, SREs, and DevOps teams.
You can explore Dynatrace Hub and New Relic I/O for a hands-on look at what’s available.
Summary:
Choose Dynatrace if you want tightly integrated, enterprise-grade automation with less manual configuration.
Choose New Relic if you prioritize OpenTelemetry, open-source support, and developer-friendly plugins.
Dynatrace vs New Relic: Pricing Model Comparison
When evaluating observability platforms like Dynatrace and New Relic, pricing can be a make-or-break factor—especially as organizations scale.
Both platforms offer enterprise-grade functionality, but their pricing models cater to different consumption patterns and organizational needs.
💰 Dynatrace: Per-Host, Tiered Pricing
Dynatrace primarily follows a per-host pricing model.
This approach charges based on the number and type of hosts being monitored.
There are also tiered plans that provide different levels of access to features such as log analytics, security monitoring, and user experience tracking.
Pros:
Predictable costs if your infrastructure is stable.
All-in-one agent simplifies billing across observability domains.
Cons:
May become expensive in dynamic environments like Kubernetes or autoscaled cloud-native apps.
Less flexibility if you’re only looking to monitor specific components (e.g., logs or metrics independently).
You can learn more about Dynatrace pricing here.
📊 New Relic: Telemetry-Based Pricing
New Relic uses a usage-based pricing model, where you pay based on the amount of telemetry data ingested (measured in GB) and the number of users with different access levels (basic vs full platform users).
This model aligns with modern observability approaches that focus on granularity and flexibility.
Pros:
Transparent pricing and easy to scale based on needs.
Allows granular control—monitor what you want, when you want.
Cons:
Costs can spike with high log volumes or poorly configured data ingestion.
May require ongoing cost optimization practices.
You can review New Relic’s pricing details here.
🔎 Cost Transparency and Scalability
Dynatrace is generally more predictable for traditional or static environments.
New Relic provides better flexibility and cost efficiency for cloud-native, variable workloads—especially if you fine-tune what’s collected.
For deeper insights on pricing trends and budget planning, you might want to check our related article on Datadog vs New Relic and how their pricing models compare.
Dynatrace vs New Relic: Use Case Recommendations
Choosing between Dynatrace and New Relic ultimately comes down to your team’s priorities, infrastructure complexity, and observability goals.
Below is a breakdown of scenarios where each tool shines.
🏢 When to Choose Dynatrace
Dynatrace is particularly well-suited for:
Large Enterprises with Complex Infrastructure: If you’re managing vast hybrid environments with thousands of services, Dynatrace’s full-stack visibility and automatic dependency mapping are invaluable.
Teams Needing Automated Root-Cause Analysis: Dynatrace’s Davis AI helps SREs and DevOps teams pinpoint and resolve issues faster, reducing Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR) significantly.
Security-Conscious Organizations: With built-in application security monitoring and anomaly detection, Dynatrace provides an edge for DevSecOps workflows.
Performance-First Use Cases: Ideal for businesses prioritizing SLA adherence, uptime guarantees, and application responsiveness.
👩💻 When to Choose New Relic
New Relic is a great fit for:
Development Teams Favoring OpenTelemetry: With first-class support for OpenTelemetry, New Relic provides modern instrumentation flexibility with no vendor lock-in.
Cost-Conscious Startups or Mid-Size Orgs: Thanks to its telemetry-based pricing, New Relic can be more affordable and adaptable—especially if you’re selective about what data you ingest.
Agile Product Teams: The platform’s ease of setup, real-time dashboards, and synthetics monitoring make it ideal for fast-moving development cycles.
Organizations Looking for a Unified Observability Experience: New Relic One consolidates logs, metrics, traces, and synthetics under a single UI.
Still unsure? You can explore our other tool comparisons like New Relic vs Datadog or Datadog vs Kibana to gain more context on stack alignment.
Dynatrace vs New Relic: Final Verdict
Choosing between Dynatrace and New Relic depends largely on your team’s size, infrastructure complexity, and priorities around automation, pricing, and extensibility.
🔍 Summary of Key Differences
Dynatrace excels in AI-powered root cause analysis, full-stack observability, and automatic dependency detection — ideal for enterprise-scale environments.
New Relic offers a more modular, flexible platform with transparent telemetry-based pricing — great for startups, agile teams, and organizations adopting OpenTelemetry.
🧩 Tool Alignment by Team Size and Goals
| Team Type | Best Fit |
|---|---|
| Large enterprises | Dynatrace – for its automation, advanced diagnostics, and scalability |
| Mid-sized teams | Either, depending on complexity and budget |
| Startups or dev-first orgs | New Relic – for its ease of setup, pricing, and open telemetry support |
🧠 Suggested Decision-Making Criteria
Ask yourself:
Do we need powerful AI-driven automation? → Go with Dynatrace
Is OpenTelemetry central to our observability strategy? → Choose New Relic
Are we working with a tight budget? → New Relic’s usage-based pricing might be more forgiving
Do we want fast time-to-value with minimal config? → Dynatrace shines with automatic instrumentation
Do we prefer control over what we monitor and pay for? → New Relic offers granular usage-based billing
Ultimately, both tools are robust and capable—your choice should reflect the specific needs and maturity of your observability practices.
Conclusion
Both Dynatrace and New Relic are powerful observability platforms that cater to different needs.
Dynatrace stands out with its robust AI-driven automation and full-stack visibility, making it a top choice for large, complex environments.
New Relic, on the other hand, offers a more flexible pricing model and strong support for OpenTelemetry, making it a solid fit for dev-focused teams and growing organizations.
If you’re still undecided, take advantage of their free tiers or product demos to evaluate each tool in your environment:
For deeper dives and documentation:
Want to compare more observability tools? Check out our related posts:
Choosing the right tool can make all the difference in your observability journey — pick the one that aligns best with your team’s workflow, goals, and budget.
Be First to Comment